This is probably the first time in history that a pandemic has caused so much widespread conflicting theories and remedies based largely on guess work, spewing from all corners of the world. This verbal diarrhea and the ensuing confusion, fear and hysteria, were further driven by videos coming from all corners of the earth through social media, which played no small part in bringing many to the brink of anxiety attacks.
The world should know by now that the Coronavirus which was alleged to have started in a “wet market” in Wuhan, China, actually came from a laboratory testing that the United States government has been funding for years, and though at the outset America played ignorance and denial, there is undeniable evidence that at least two former presidents stressed the importance of preparation for a pandemic. One cannot help but wonder if their knowledge of the experiments spurred their fears.
Now that the world has gone into a tailspin, medical professionals and even government officials are inching their way forward with the truth.
Yes, American tax payers’ money has been funding these experiments at The Wuhan Institute of Virology, confirmed Senator Ted Cruz, and this, according to him, was not just involving one lab in Wuhan, but two, within close proximity. He further stated that the US administration was concerned about the safety of the labs. These experiments were being conducted to study viral diversities in bat’s reservoirs, and the laboratory experiments were being conducted to determine which new viruses posed the greatest threat to human health. But apparently, there isn’t enough evidence yet, for concluding that the dissemination of this viral toxicity of global proportions was triggered from an accident from the lab.
The renowned biologist and toxicologist, Dr Rashid Buttar, has another spin on this
He believes that these experiments were deliberate attempts at Chimeric research, which means mutating the virus and genetically modifying it to make it more harmful, more virulent and more resistant through adding the SHC014 strain of the SARS Coronavirus and inserting AIDS and MERS, a Middle East respiratory illness which can be fatal.
Though there seemed to have been no justification for this three million dollar tax funded research, and the opposing factions voiced their disapproval, it is alleged that Dr. Fauci took a unilateral decision, well within his power so to do, to continue on this course. He is even on record for predicting a pandemic of these proportions back in 2017. Dr. Buttar postulates that both the symptoms and the means for transmitting the virus, along with the hypothetical treatment, are incorrect for a virus that up to now cannot be properly or conclusively diagnosed. He believes that the numbers being churned out for deaths from Covid-19 are over inflated and that this whole scenario is a grand attempt at fear mongering. Of important note is that the current testing being used to diagnose the virus, comes up positive for Covid-19 in people who have been taking the flu shots over the preceding 19 years.
On the other hand, Cameron Kyle-Sidell, MD, a critical care doctor out of New York,
fears that patients are being treated for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), which has pneumonia like symptoms and that for lack of proper diagnosis, hospitals across America have been instructed to render this prescribed treatment which is being given for the wrong disease. He believes that the Coronavirus looks more like high altitude disease and that the patients that he has seen are in fact “slowly being starved of oxygen.” He postulates that ventilators are used for patients with respiratory failure to do the work that their muscles would normally do but under the circumstances cannot because the muscle strength is so compromised, but Covid-19 patients muscles work fine, based on his examinations. A false paradigm is being used to treat a new disease, he contends, and so if ventilators have to be used, programming is of the utmost importance because as it stands, in effect, the treatment is increasing pressure on the lungs in order to open them up, and this is doing more harm than good.
But this is not where it ends. Many are still conflicted with thoughts of the Coronavirus being caused from over exposure to radiation through 5G Networks. In March 2020, for example, thousands of birds dropped dead from the sky, in places like Sikeston, Missouri, and as far away as Rome, Italy and Laeso, Denmark, where around 200 ducks were found dead. The birds were tested for influenza, but this came back negative. The cause of death is yet to be determined.
It is a known fact that birds have an inner receptor or uncanny instinct, of foretelling natural disasters or bad weather and they are usually able to flee those areas when these conditions pose a threat. The speculation on this phenomenon is that 5G radiation is affecting not only human lives, with the deadly Covid-19 but that the radiation is killing the very birds of the air.
There is one school of thought that believes radiation dissipates as it moves across the air but the credible publication pureearth.org argues that there is no reason to believe that 5G Radiation is safe. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have done tests using rats to affirm behavioral changes that occurs from being exposed to Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) and found “harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.” Over 240 scientists have corroborated on the fact that Electromagnetic Fields affect living organisms even below international and national guidelines. “Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” The FDA refuted these findings back in 1996 and decided without any further research, to stand by their belief that no changes to the current standards are necessary.
According to blog.scienceamerican, “The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.” These findings were based on studies of 2G and 3G radiation however, since the government has refused to fund 4G and 5G technology.
Certain members of the medical fraternity are however concerned about “the increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with results from case-control studies of tumor risk in heavy cell phone users.”
The details here should be of great concern to every human being alive and for generations to come:
“5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.
As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play?
Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety.”
The speculative ploy and political engineering are quite another matter.
Founder & Publisher